We have no irreplaceables
We have no irreplaceables
A phrase known in socio-political vocabulary since the beginning of the 20th century. At first it became known as the slogan (“There are no irreplaceable people”), under which the future man conducted his election campaign (1912). American President Woodrow Wilson, who borrowed this expression from the French language. Later (1932) this slogan was used by Franklin Delano Roosevelt when fighting with Howard Hoover for the presidency.
In Russia, this expression is known as the phrase of I.V. Stalin, although in this form it is not found anywhere in his speeches or writings. Apparently, party propagandists and journalists simply “creatively developed” (using a ready-made slogan), the following passage from the Report (section III, part 2), which Stalin spoke at the XVII Congress of the CPSU(b) in 1934. Meaning some senior party and Soviet officials, he said: “These arrogant nobles think that they are indispensable and that they can violate the decisions of the governing bodies with impunity. They should be removed from leadership positions without hesitation, regardless of their past merits.”
Quoted: humorously and ironically.
Encyclopedic Dictionary of winged words and expressions. - M.: “Locked-Press”. Vadim Serov. 2003.
See what “We have no irreplaceables” means in other dictionaries:
See: We have no irreplaceable people. Encyclopedic Dictionary of winged words and expressions. M.: Locked Press. Vadim Serov. 2003 ... Dictionary of popular words and expressions
Contents of the article: The concept of bibliography. I. General bibliography. II. Review of bi6liography by state and nationality. France. Italy. Spain and Portugal. Germany. Austria-Hungary. Switzerland. Belgium and Holland. England. Denmark,... ... Encyclopedic Dictionary F.A. Brockhaus and I.A. Efron
Adelino Hermitério da Palma Carlos Adelino Hermitério da Palma Carlos ... Wikipedia
Wheat- (Wheat) Wheat is a widespread grain crop Concept, classification, value and nutritional properties of wheat varieties Contents >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... Investor Encyclopedia
Ronald Wilson Reagan- (Ronald Wilson Reagan) Biography of Reagan, youth and career of Reagan Biography of Reagan, youth and career of Reagan, policies of President Reagan Contents Contents 1 Youth of R. Reagan 2 Cinema radio career 3. First steps in social activities. V … Investor Encyclopedia
Commodity shortages in certain areas were characteristic of certain periods in the history of the USSR and formed the “seller economy” of producers and the trading system in a planned economy (lack of competition... ... Wikipedia
This term has other meanings, see Galileo. Galileo Genre popular science entertainment Director(s) Kirill Gavrilov, Elena Kaliberda Editor(s) Dmitry Samorodov Production TV format (… Wikipedia
Probably each of us has heard the phrase: “There are no irreplaceable people.” The aphorism is quite common. Some people agree with him, but others may argue about this. Not everyone knows where this expression came from. Who first said it and why did it become so popular? We will try to sort out these and other questions in this article.
Who is the author of the phrase “There are no irreplaceable people”?
In Russia, the authorship of this expression is often attributed to J.V. Stalin. However, in fact, there are no sources that would confirm this fact. The only place where a phrase similar in meaning was heard was his report at the congress of the All-Union Communist Party. In it, he mentions “arrogant nobles” who consider themselves indispensable, and therefore feel their impunity. Stalin called for depriving such people of their positions, despite all their past merits.
In fact, this expression became so widespread after the election campaign of Wilson, who ran for the presidency of the United States in 1912. However, he was not its author either. Wilson borrowed from the French language.
There are no irreplaceable people, but...
In the middle of the last century, the famous Spanish artist Pablo Picasso uttered a phrase that somewhere in meaning echoes ours. In his performance it sounded like this: “There are no irreplaceables, but there are unique ones.”
This expression is more to the liking of those who do not entirely agree with the statement that there are no irreplaceable people. In the statement of the great artist, there is agreement that people are replaceable, but there are also individuals who forever leave a mark and cannot be forgotten. Of course, the planet will not stop spinning with the passing of even the greatest people. Life will continue, moreover, it will develop, new discoveries will be made. However, the achievements and works of such people will never be forgotten, and the memory of them will be passed on through the centuries.
Who likes to use the phrase “There are no irreplaceable people”
The bosses are very fond of this phrase. If an employee is not satisfied with something, with this phrase the boss can hint that a replacement will be found to take the place of any employee. However, in our time, valuable personnel are worth their weight in gold, so specialists are very much valued. There are real people with enormous experience, knowledge and skills. They are really difficult to replace. Especially in such important areas as medicine, science, politics, etc. It happens that more than a dozen years will pass before a worthy replacement comes to replace a gifted doctor, great scientist or talented leader.
Conclusion
There are no irreplaceable people. This is both true and not entirely true. This is both good and bad at the same time. The truth is that no matter how gifted, talented and great a person is, life on the planet will not stop with his passing. Someone will still pick up the baton and carry it further. And this is good, otherwise the development of humanity would stop at some point. But the other side of the coin is that there are people who still turn out to be indispensable for someone specifically. With their departure, life loses its meaning, and in this case, the phrase “there are no irreplaceable people” only causes bitterness and protest. People may appear in life who will fill some gaps, but they will still take their place, but not the place of the departed.
Thus, this aphorism in a global sense probably makes sense. However, there are different situations in life, and, perhaps, this phrase will not be appropriate in all cases. Although this also depends on the person. There are people who do not have special attachments, and in their case the aphorism is whatever the circumstances in their life are.
Children of the 20th Congress, almost all of us were anti-Stalinists in our youth. And when, in Brezhnev’s times, older men hung portraits of Stalin on the windshields of their trucks and cars, as a call for “order” and a protest against this “stagnation,” I continued to be an anti-Stalinist.
After the 20th Congress, Stalin was buried so deeply by the “communists” that the understanding of “what Stalin is” did not come all at once and will continue to unfold for a long time...
Stalin didn't say this:
“If there is a person, there is a problem. No person - no problem"
“The death of a person is a tragedy, the death of millions is a statistic”
“We don’t have irreplaceable people”
“There are no prisoners of war in the Red Army, there are only traitors and traitors to the Motherland”
“It doesn’t matter how they vote, it’s important how they count”
There is a person - there is a problem. No person - no problem
This myth is used to point out Stalin's cruelty and disregard for human life. In fact, Stalin never said anything like this. This statement was invented by the writer A. Rybakov and attributed it to Stalin in his book “Children of the Arbat”:
“In one of my articles, which he especially liked, I reproduced Stalin’s famous aphorism: “There is a man, there is a problem. No person - no problem! Anatoly Naumovich glared: where did Stalin say this? In which of your works? Or in a note? Or in what speech? I thought about it. He answered like this: knowing a little about Stalin’s psychology, I assume and am even sure that he never publicly spoke these exact words. And I didn’t write.
He was a great actor in politics and would not allow himself to reveal his essence. He could allow himself such frankness only in a very narrow circle of his “comrades-in-arms,” or rather, lackeys. Where did I read this? Yes, it's kind of vague. Hangs in the air. A lot of where. In memoirs... In journalism. This phrase has become a kind of cliche to denote that era. - So you don’t remember exactly where? - Absolutely not. “So that’s it,” cried Anatoly Naumovich with youthful liveliness, “I came up with it myself!” For the first time in “Children of the Arbat,” Stalin utters this phrase. I composed it and put it in Stalin’s mouth! I wrote this novel 20 years before its publication in 1987. And from there she went for a walk, and no one remembers where she came from.
“The death of a person is a tragedy, the death of millions is a statistic”
It is alleged that Stalin uttered the phrase: “The death of a person is a tragedy, the death of millions is a statistic.” In fact, Stalin did not say such words. This phrase is a slightly paraphrased quote from Remarque’s novel “The Black Obelisk”: “But, apparently, this always happens: the death of one person is death, and the death of two million is just statistics.”
“We don’t have irreplaceable people”
Stalin did not say anything like that. A phrase from Alexander Korneychuk’s play “Front” (1942). Moreover, Korneychuk, a Ukrainian Soviet playwright and 5-time (!) laureate of the Stalin Prize in the field of art, was also NOT the author of this aphorism. He only translated into Russian the slogan of the French Revolution of 1789-94. The Commissioner of the Convention, Joseph Le Bon, responded with this phrase to a petition for pardon from an aristocrat.
In 1793, Viscount de Ghiselin, arrested for political unreliability, asked to spare his life, since his education and experience could still be useful to the Republic (as he thought). To which the Jacobin commissioner replied: “There are no irreplaceable people in the Republic!” It is interesting that two years after that, in 1795, other revolutionaries sent Commissar Le Bon himself to the guillotine. Well, there are no irreplaceable people!
“There are no prisoners of war in the Red Army, there are only traitors and traitors to the Motherland”
Famous phrase attributed to Stalin. Khavkin in his article “German prisoners of war in the USSR and Soviet prisoners of war in Germany. Formulation of the problem. Sources and Literature” cites this phrase, referring to the Certificate of the Commission for the Rehabilitation of Victims of Political Repression. What’s interesting is that there really is such a phrase there, that’s the name of one part of this certificate. No reference is given to where this phrase came from, where, when and to whom Stalin said this.
The most interesting thing is that there are no links in the help at all. Only in the introduction are the names of the archives in which they worked mentioned.” There is a version that this phrase was allegedly uttered by Stalin in a conversation with the representative of the International Red Cross, Count Bernadotte, and is quoted in his memoirs. The phrase in the retellings is formulated as follows: “... there are no Russian prisoners of war - the Russian soldier is fighting to the death.
If he chooses captivity, then he is automatically excluded from the Russian community,” which somewhat changes its meaning, because “Russian community” is a moral category, not a legal one, i.e. “We will despise the prisoners, but you will return the prisoners to us and observe the conventions on prisoners of war.”
“It doesn’t matter how they vote, it’s important how they count”
The author of the famous phrase is Napoleon III. He said it after the next plebiscite in France. Comrade Stalin simply paraphrased them: “In bourgeois countries, it is important not how they vote, but how they count.” First appeared in the memoirs of defector B. Bazhanov (to France, January 1, 1928) Full quote “You know, comrades,” says Stalin, “what I think about this: I think that it doesn’t matter at all who will vote in the party and how; but what is extremely important is who will count the votes and how.” However, it is extremely doubtful that Stalin would say this clearly compromising phrase in public.
US presidential candidate attributed false phrase about America to Stalin
Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson, during a televised debate, quoted the “words” of Joseph Stalin, which he never actually said.
“Joseph Stalin said that if you want to destroy America, you need to destroy three things - our spiritual life, our patriotism and our morality,” Carson said.
Very quickly, viewers and Internet users discovered that the presidential candidate had used false words. After this, hundreds of ironic comments rained down on Carson.
It is curious that the quote given by Ben Carson is well known to the Russian audience - it is cited, but only in reverse translation in relation to Russia, either as part of the so-called “”, or as a statement by Zbigniew Brzezinski. Some even attribute it to Otto von Bismarck.
The incident that happened to B. Carson is not so rare. Thanks to the Internet, the circulation of loud sayings and aphorisms famous people, who actually didn’t say anything like that, became widespread.
Leader October revolution Vladimir Ilyich Lenin wrote about this: “The main problem with quotes on the Internet is that people immediately believe in their authenticity.”
One of the most painful truths a person discovers is that no one is irreplaceable. Although we don't want to admit it. After all, everyone likes to feel like a hero. We love to know that we are important and invaluable to someone, believing that the other could not live without us.
Despite this, reality shows again and again that no one is irreplaceable. It's okay to feel unique, because you are. However, there are many people in this world and, as painful as it may be, we are not vital to anyone else.
You may not realize your own need until you get a partner. In a family, everyone goes their own way and even our best friends can leave us or betray us. But what happens to personal relationships? What happens when we become truly intimate with someone?
There is still an element in romantic relationships that causes great pain—possessiveness. We think that having a partner means owning someone, that he should always be with us, and that we will spend the rest of our lives with this person. I wonder if the reason for this is love, the oiliness caused by the feeling of falling in love, or something else? This other thing makes us forget that no one belongs to anyone. And you also do not belong to anyone.
Every person is free. The problem is how we have learned to perceive relationships. For example, think about a time when someone filled your life and you felt like you were an integral part of them. When it was all over, the whole world was destroyed. But is life over? No. She moves on and you forget about the past as soon as you meet someone new.
Top 10 craziest travelers
You need to be able to leave on time. Assuming that you are an integral part of someone's life can make it difficult to let the other person go when it is time to do so. Think about the mom or dad who thinks their child can't live without them. They do not understand that the time comes when they have to let it go into life, and by resisting this they only cause harm. The same thing happens with so many relationships in our lives. Sometimes our own need to feel important to someone makes us selfish and prevents us from seeing that the moment has come when we need to leave. And the moment when you should let someone go. In romantic relationships, the worst possible situation is created, which quite often leads to toxicity. You need to get out of this. Everyone can find a replacement, and you are no exception.
Do you think there will always be someone who needs you? Doubtful. We should understand that people who come into life will at some point leave it. The same goes for you.
You cannot replace yourself for yourself. Do you know for whom you are truly indispensable? Who will always demand you? The answer is yourself. Only a person cannot replace himself. You are the only ones who will never leave you. You will always be here and you will always be yourself best friend. This is why it is so important to believe in yourself and love yourself. You need to accept yourself as you are. Once you realize that no one is irreplaceable, this will stop bothering you. You have you, and you need to do what you can to be the happiest you can be.
One day someone dropped a similar phrase, and everyone picked it up. They believed that people could be shuffled like cards, and nothing would change.
The sun will still be blushing, and things will be going smoothly. The sun will definitely roll out and stick to the sky, but questions will definitely arise with the energy of a particular person. After all, no one can repeat anyone. There is a bakery at the end of my house. Tiny, with rustic violets on the windowsills and stacks of old magazines. Croissants with whole apricots are baked in it and cocoa is poured into Czech porcelain. Every time I return from training, I stop by for a buckwheat baguette and talk to the saleswoman. She stands behind the counter in a white starched apron and resembles the “gray-haired and stern old woman” from the fairy tale “The House That Jack Built.” Always sterile, friendly, with powdered hair at the roots.
Are there no irreplaceable people? Are you sure?
We bow to each other in the old-fashioned way and chat about this and that. I share that my husband taught the child to growl, and now she imagines herself to be either a lion cub or a puppy. She talks about her old dog Lola, who sings along to Leps.
A month ago, the woman quit her job and went to live with her son. Her place was taken by a sullen aunt without a hairstyle and “the house that Jack built.” Without a smile, soft energy, casual hospitality.
I still buy bread, but my life has lost the usual morning conversation.
During our student years, we chose a tiny restaurant located in a cellar. It fried cordon bleu, made dumplings, poured draft beer and served the cheapest coffee in the city. They played “Hands Up” and “Tramp Boy.”
Things went sluggishly, monotonously, until a new administrator appeared: a skinny, choleric girl. She started hosting cocktail parties, changed the menu, arranged candles and invited musicians.
Two guitarists theatrically hung their coats on the backs of high chairs and sang “Sunday” and “Secret”. On Fridays, the barista held raffles. On Mondays - tasting of new dishes.
Business picked up sharply, and people started booking tables in advance, until the “administrator” got married and went on maternity leave.
The restaurant immediately deflated, returned to its previous sluggish life, and then closed completely.
“There are no irreplaceable people,” said someone in France. This was repeated by Woodrow Wilson, followed by Stalin, and many of us continue to say this.
Similarly, Pliny the Elder, without checking, wrote that ostriches bury their heads in the sand, while they simply lay their necks on the ground to rest.
Similarly, we argue that soup must be eaten every day, a cactus saves you from harmful radiation, and if a person grinds his teeth, it means he has worms.
In fact, there is nothing useful in boiled vegetables, invisible radiation cannot be absorbed, and you can only replace the battery in a watch, and it is not a fact that it will run as before.
